Browse bulletin items by A-Z

Published: 22nd August, 2025


Contents

New from bpacnz: Lead exposure and toxicity associated with Ayurvedic medicines

Ayurveda is a traditional medicine system that originated in India more than 3,000 years ago. Lead and other heavy metals including mercury, arsenic and cadmium, are commonly added to Ayurvedic medicines. This poses a significant health risk for people who use these products. This is highlighted by the recent lead poisoning case cluster in New Zealand; there have been 22 notified cases of lead poisoning confirmed or suspected to involve Ayurvedic medicines (up to May, 2025). Many of the patients were symptomatic and found to have blood lead levels well above the notifiable level (≥ 0.24 micromol/L), requiring hospital-level care. However, the non-specificity of the symptoms these patients presented with meant a diagnosis of lead toxicity was not always initially made.

This article summarises the recent lead poisoning case cluster and provides information on identification, confirmation of diagnosis and appropriate referral pathways for patients with elevated blood lead levels relating to their use of Ayurvedic medicines. General information on other relevant heavy metal exposures is also provided.

Key messages:

  • Always ask patients about their use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs)
  • Consider lead toxicity in patients with a history of Ayurvedic medicine use; they may present with non-specific symptoms and signs
  • Arrange a blood lead level if lead exposure is suspected and notify your local National Public Health Service office; you can do this via the Hazardous Substances Disease and Injury Reporting Tool (HSDIRT) in your practice management system

Read the full article here.


Round up of recent bpacnz publications



Medicines news

The following news relating to medicine supply has recently been announced. These items are selected based on their relevance to primary care and where issues for patients are anticipated, e.g. no alternative medicine available or changing to the alternative presents issues. Information about medicine supply is available in the New Zealand Formulary at the top of the individual monograph for any affected medicine and summarised here.


Decision to amend access criteria for COVID-19 antivirals

Pharmac has announced the decision to amend the eligibility criteria for funded access to COVID-19 antivirals, following consultation (as reported in Bulletin 123). From 1st September, 2025, all people aged 50 years or over who are considered by their healthcare professional to be at high risk of hospitalisation or death from COVID-19 will be eligible for funded antiviral treatment. This decision applies to both COVID-19 antivirals, nirmatrelvir with ritonavir (Paxlovid) and remdesivir (Veklury), however, only orally administered nirmatrelvir with ritonavir is prescribed in the community. All other eligibility criteria for funded treatment with COVID-19 antivirals remain the same; the access criteria can be found here.

This decision also impacts the way nirmatrelvir with ritonavir is ordered, supplied and claimed for, to align with other funded medicines. As part of these changes, a co-payment can be applied when dispensing nirmatrelvir with ritonavir from 1st September, 2025. For further information, click here.

Coming soon: Guidance on determining patients at high risk

bpacnz will be providing further guidance on groups considered to be at high risk of severe outcomes from COVID-19, to assist prescribers in their decision-making. This information will be available on our website by 1st September, 2025. A more comprehensive resource about prescribing antiviral medicines for COVID-19 is also in development.


Proposal to change clozapine blood monitoring and prescribing requirements

Medsafe is proposing changes to clozapine blood monitoring and prescribing requirements and is seeking feedback from both healthcare professionals and people taking the medicine. The proposed changes relate to the duration of blood monitoring, monitoring thresholds, management of low blood count results and who can prescribe clozapine.

If this proposal is accepted, patients taking clozapine who have no history of low blood counts and can self-manage their care, will not require blood monitoring beyond a specified treatment period (proposed between one and three years). Clozapine would still need to be initiated by a psychiatrist or a medical practitioner in consultation with a psychiatrist, however, some nurse practitioners, nurse prescribers and pharmacist prescribers would be able to continue clozapine prescribing, and re-initiate treatment if it was stopped due to a low blood count that was found not to be related to clozapine.

The proposal is also seeking feedback about the use of point-of-care testing for clozapine monitoring, and the educational needs of healthcare professionals related to prescribing and safety monitoring. N.B. This proposal does not include any changes to the clozapine special monitoring arrangements, e.g. for patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Consultation closes on 8th October, 2025. This link contains an online form for healthcare professionals to complete. The online form for people taking clozapine to provide feedback is available here.

A news item from the Ministry of Health, Manatū Hauora, about the consultation is available, here.


South GPCME 2025: Top ten takeaways

The bpacnz Publications Team has returned from the South GPCME 2025 conference in Christchurch, revitalised and with a plethora of new ideas and opportunities ahead of us. It was an incredible experience to meet so many of our readers and hear such positive feedback about our educational resources. We would especially like to thank the South Link Education Trust who supported us to attend. We are planning to bring more conference-related items to the Best Practice Bulletin in the coming weeks, however, to start we have put together a list of the key takeaways that stuck with us from the weekend.


World Sepsis Day in September

World Sepsis Day is coming up on Saturday, 13th September, providing an opportunity to raise awareness about sepsis and promote prevention measures. Globally, there are an estimated 47 to 50 million cases of sepsis per year, with 40% occurring in children aged under five years. Sepsis is also the cause of one in five deaths worldwide. Early recognition of symptoms and timely treatment are essential to prevent sepsis-related death, as is prevention of infection through vaccination, hygiene and other infection control measures.

The theme for this year’s World Sepsis Day is 5 facts x 5 actions, which aims to highlight five key facts about sepsis, and five actions which can be put in place to prevent sepsis-related death. Further information is available from: https://www.worldsepsisday.org/.

Sepsis Trust NZ is inviting individuals to be SEPSIS Superheroes this September, by hosting a workplace morning tea or other event to raise awareness. For further information, see: https://stopsepsis.org.nz/.

Resources for World Sepsis Day, including infographics, posters, videos and handouts, are available from: https://www.worldsepsisday.org/toolkits

For further information on identifying the risk of sepsis in young children with fever, see: https://bpac.org.nz/2024/fever.aspx


Paper of the Week: Gabapentin may be preferable to pregabalin in older adults at risk of heart failure

Limited effective pharmacological treatment options can make managing pain challenging. First-line treatment options for neuropathic pain are gabapentinoids (gabapentin and pregabalin) or tricyclic antidepressants (nortriptyline and amitriptyline). There is no evidence supporting superior efficacy of either class of medicine, therefore the prescribing decision is based on adverse effect profiles, interactions with existing medicines and co-morbidities. Gabapentinoids may be preferred in older patients at increased risk of anticholinergic burden, which would be exacerbated by the addition of a tricyclic antidepressant. There is no evidence that gabapentinoids are effective for nociceptive pain and they should not be used as a general analgesic or on an “as needed” basis.

Gabapentinoids are not without problems; common adverse effects include sedation, increased falls risk, weight gain, mood changes and respiratory depression, along with the potential for medicine misuse and addiction. Increasing evidence has also identified peripheral oedema and heart failure as less common but significant adverse effects. Pregabalin has a higher receptor binding affinity for specific calcium channel subtypes and increased potency relative to gabapentin, therefore may have a higher risk of cardiovascular-related adverse effects. However, there is currently limited evidence supporting this theory; most gabapentinoid safety studies to-date have focused on neurological effects and have not examined the impact of cardiovascular risk factors, e.g. older age, heart failure, on the development of adverse effects.

A study published in JAMA Network Open examined whether the risk of developing heart failure was higher for older patients prescribed pregabalin for chronic pain, compared to those prescribed gabapentin. It was found that risk was approximately 50% higher in patients prescribed pregabalin. This effect was more pronounced in participants with a history of cardiovascular disease. These findings suggest that, if indicated, clinicians should consider prescribing gabapentin instead of pregabalin in older adults with a history of cardiovascular disease or other risk factors for the development of heart failure.

Were you aware that heart failure is a potential adverse effect of gabapentinoids? What patient factors do you consider when deciding between prescribing pregabalin, gabapentin or a tricyclic antidepressant for neuropathic pain? What non-pharmacological advice do you give about neuropathic pain management? Are there any situations in which you think the potential benefits of prescribing gabapentinoids for an unapproved indication outweigh the harms, e.g. for sciatica or non-specific back pain?

Park EE, Daniel LL, Dickson AL, et al. Initiation of pregabalin vs gabapentin and development of heart failure. JAMA Netw Open 2025;8:e2524451. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.24451.

For further information on prescribing gabapentinoids in primary care, see: https://bpac.org.nz/2021/gabapentinoids.aspx

This Bulletin is supported by the South Link Education Trust

If you have any information you would like us to add to our next bulletin, please email: editor@bpac.org.nz

© This resource is the subject of copyright which is owned by bpacnz. You may access it, but you may not reproduce it or any part of it except in the limited situations described in the terms of use on our website.

Made with by the bpacnz team

Partner links