Prescriber responsibility and polypharmacy
		
		It is increasingly recognised that health care for older people is improved when one prescriber takes responsibility
			for all of a patient's medicines.1 An important reason for this is that multiple prescribers are associated
			with increased polypharmacy (Figure 1). This exposes patients to increased risk, as the probability of an adverse drug
			reaction occurring increases as the patient takes more medicines.2 Multiple prescribers are also an independent
			risk factor for adverse drug reactions in older populations.3
		Polypharmacy among older populations is also significantly associated with hypoglycaemia, malnutrition, pneumonia, fractures,
			hospitalisation and death.5 An analysis of national dispensing data showed that 44% of enrolled patients aged
			over 75 years in New Zealand used five or more medicines continuously over a nine month period in 2011/2012.4
		 
		
		 
			 Figure 1: Average number of medicines prescribed per patient (Jul 2011 - Mar 2012) for all patients
				aged over 75 years in New Zealand, by number of prescribers4 
		 
		 
		
		A single prescriber provides consistency 
		Oversight of medicines by a single prescriber allows for consistent advice and decision making. This is important when
			treating elderly people, as prescribing recommendations are often based on studies of younger populations where co-morbidities
			have been excluded. In older patients with complex co-morbidities, strict adherence to such guidelines can result in confusing
			regimens with a high probability of adverse drug reactions.6 Prescribers need to tailor interventions to an
			individual's overall risk, as the benefits gained by participants in clinical trials may not be generalisable to an older
			person with multiple co-morbidities. In some cases, it may be jointly decided by patient and clinician to stop, or not
			to initiate, treatment.
		 
		
		Adopting a standardised approach to prescribing for older people
		Three essential elements of prescribing to older people in primary care are:
		
			- The introduction of a standardised format when assessing medicine use
 
			- Avoiding inappropriate prescribing
 
			- The use of validated tools to withdraw unnecessary medicines 
 
		
		
		 
		 
		
		
		
		
		Standardising consultations with routine questions
		What medicines are you currently taking?
		
		Older people frequently have multiple co-morbidities and reduced renal and hepatic function. They are therefore more
			likely to be affected by adverse drug reactions than younger people.
		It is also important to find out if the patient is adhering to their prescribed medicines. Medicine non-adherence in
			older people may occur due to forgetfulness, adverse effects, limited organisational skills or belief that the medicine
			is unnecessary, ineffective or too costly.7 Reports of non-adherence in older people varies from one-quarter
			to over one-half, depending on the definition and the population studied.7 Simple questions about what, why
			and how patients take their medicines can reveal gaps in understanding and compliance that otherwise may not be volunteered.
			Medicine organisers or blister packs may be introduced for patients who experience confusion or forget to take their medicines
			regularly.
		What medicines do you buy yourself and do you take medicines prescribed for anybody else? Some patients may not consider
			products that they have purchased from the supermarket or health store as medicines. Specifically asking about medicine
			purchasing habits may reveal relevant information. For example, an older person with chronic kidney disease taking angiotensin
			converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and diuretics will be at increased risk of developing acute kidney injury if they
			also take ibuprofen purchased from a supermarket. 
		Sharing of medicines is also common among older people. Survey results indicate that 13 - 20% of older people have shared
			their medicine with another person.8
		Over-the-counter (OTC) products and complementary and alternative medicines can also have significant interactions with
			prescribed medicines, e.g. warfarin in combination with significant quantities of garlic, ginger, ginseng or ginkgo may
			result in an increased risk of bleeding.9 One study of over 1000 people, with a mean age of 76 years, found
			that approximately one-third of participants had complementary medicines in their home, with almost all of these in active
			use.10 The most common potential adverse effects due to interactions between prescribed medicines and alternative
			products were: increased risk of bleeding due to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) interacting with vitamin
			E, fish oils, ginkgo and garlic, or hyperkalaemia caused by ACEIs and concurrent use of potassium or 
			arginine supplements.10
		 
		
		Have you visited another doctor or been admitted to hospital?
		Primary care management of medicines requires timely information about prescribing changes initiated in secondary care.
			Asking patients if they have visited another health professional is a simple way of checking if their medicine regimen
			has been altered. If the patient has had a consultation with another clinician, ask if they were prescribed any new medicines,
			or if they were told that they could stop taking medicines that had been previously prescribed. 
		Hospital admission in older people is associated with an increase in the number of long-term medicines taken. A New
			Zealand study of over 400 older people found that following a stay in hospital, the average number of medicines prescribed
			to patients increased from 6.6 to 7.7.11 If secondary care prescribers are unaware of all the medicines a patient
			is taking, the risk of prescription duplication and/or adverse drug reactions are increased. Furthermore, some medicines
			initiated in secondary care may not be intended for long-term use, e.g. omeprazole taken for prophylaxis against stress
			ulceration before surgery. Secondary care initiation of uncommon medicines can also present challenges to primary care
			prescribers assessing the risk and benefits of continuing these medicines. Similarly, if secondary care prescribers are
			unaware of the indications for continuing some medicines, e.g. antidepressants, appropriate treatment may be inadvertently
			withdrawn. 
		 
 Best Practice tip: Practices may consider implementing a system where
			older patients who have been recently discharged from hospital for non-routine events, are phoned and offered a follow-up
			consultation to discuss any possible changes to their treatment. 
		 
		
		Do you have any concerns about any medicines you are taking? 
		 Regularly assessing medicine effectiveness (including asking patients if they feel their medicines help) and monitoring
			for adverse effects allows for appropriate dose adjustment and the risk of long-term adverse drug reactions to be minimised.
			This question also provides a prompt for some older patients who may just "put up" with adverse effects without mentioning
			them. Discussing concerns may also increase patients' health literacy and improve treatment adherence. 
		
		 
		 
		
		
		
		
		Actions and questions for prescribers
		
		Medicines information gathered from consultations can be combined with information taken from patient records (including
			hospital discharge notes and dispensing record) to reconcile the list of medicines a patient is taking. 
		Performing medicine reconciliations and medicine reviews
		Medicine reconciliation is the systematic process of obtaining a complete list of all of a patient's medicines. It should
			be performed whenever a patient is seen for the first time, or discharged from hospital. All medicines, including OTC
			medicines, supplements and alternative products should be recorded in the PMS. This list should include doses, regimen,
			administration routes and last dose taken.12 All drug allergies, intolerances and previous treatment terminations,
			and the reasons for discontinuation, should also be recorded. 
		Many older patients take their medicines from blister packs and have limited knowledge about some medicines prescribed
			to them. Suggesting that patients bring their medications to the consultation and performing a "brown-bag review" can
			assist the reconciliation process. 
		Medicine reviews aim to eliminate medicines that are no longer required or have a high risk of toxicity. These should
			be conducted annually for all older patients taking medicines and every six months for those taking multiple medicines,
			e.g. five or more medicines taken simultaneously.1 However, thought should be given to the appropriateness
			of medicines every time a prescription is renewed. 
		Pharmacist and/or nurse participation in the reconciliation process has been shown to be beneficial (see: "The Pharmacy
			Services Agreement", below). A Canadian study found that in 120 patients aged over 50 years, following review by a pharmacist
			and a nurse practitioner, the number of inappropriate medicines decreased from 27% to 9% and the number of patients taking
			at least one inappropriate medicine decreased from 78% to 39%.13
		Specifically trained clinical pharmacists can provide another level of expertise by contributing to medicine management
			through clinical recommendation.
		 
		
		
			The Pharmacy Services Agreement - The changing role of the community pharmacist
			Under the new Long Term Conditions (LTC) rules of the Pharmacy Services Agreement, community pharmacists will now be
				identifying patients with complex co-morbidities and/or difficulties with medicine adherence. To assist pharmacists,
				an objective assessment tool has been developed. Patients can be referred to be assessed by indicating "Refer for LTC
				assessment" on a prescription or by contacting the pharmacist directly. Family members and patients themselves can also
				request an LTC assessment. 
			Pharmacists will be funded to assist in the management of patients referred for LTC assessment. Part of the assessment
				will be to determine dispensing frequency. Patients who are currently dispensed their medicines under Close Control can
				remain on this dispensing frequency until they are assessed for LTC eligibility. Pharmacists have until 31 January 2013
				to complete these assessments.
			In addition to the LTC service, some DHBs are still funding medicine use reviews by accredited pharmacists to improve
				patient education and adherence. To find out if this service is available in your area, contact your local DHB.
			 
 For further information see: "New
					service model for community pharmacy", BPJ 45 (Aug, 2012) or 
					www.pharmac.govt.nz/ccc 
		 
		 
		
		Before prescribing a medicine, consider the following:
		Am I treating the condition or a symptom? It is important to establish a diagnosis so that treatment will target the
			underlying process rather than an isolated symptom. If a patient is taking multiple medicines, clinicians should exclude
			the possibility that any new symptoms may be due to adverse drug reactions.
		Be aware of the possibility of the prescribing cascade concept, which can begin when an adverse drug reaction is misinterpreted
			as a new medical condition. This can result in a new medicine being unnecessarily prescribed to treat the adverse reaction
			which in turn increases the risk of the patient experiencing another adverse drug reaction. An example of this is the
			use of prochlorperazine for the treatment of dizziness in patients taking medicines such as antihypertensives.14 Prochlorperazine
			is associated with postural hypotension and may exacerbate the original symptom and can also cause drug-induced parkinsonism.
			These adverse effects may explain the resulting 50% increase in the observed rates of hip fracture in older people following
			initiation of prochlorperazine.14
		Have I considered non-pharmacological treatment? Non-pharmacological interventions, in some cases, can provide both
			physical and psychological health benefits to older people, e.g. physiotherapy for chronic back pain. Improving nutrition
			and physical activity can also reduce people's risk of chronic disease and increase their independence. The introduction
			of mobility aids, e.g. a walking frame, may also improve quality of life.
		 
 The Ministry of Health provide nutrition guidelines for healthy older
			people, available from: www.health.govt.nz/search (key
			words = nutrition older) 
		Is the medicine appropriate to the patient's condition and stage of life? When considering prescribing medicines to
			older people it can be useful to group medicines into those that improve quality of life, e.g. analgesics, and those used
			for disease prevention. The benefit of medicines that improve quality of life is clearly evident. However, preventative
			interventions require (to some degree) the clinician convincing the patient, and themselves, that treatment will provide
			benefit. For example, the Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk of vascular disease (PROSPER) trial
			showed that while pravastatin given to over 5000 participants aged 70 - 82 years did reduce cardiovascular morbidity and
			mortality, it was not associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality.17 This was partially explained by
			an increased incidence of new cancer diagnosis, suggesting that for some patients, preventing one cause of death simply
			revealed another. Some older patients, who had elected to take a statin to reduce cardiovascular risk for primary prevention,
			may not have made the same decision if they had been told that treatment was unlikely to prolong their life. However,
			aggressive statin treatment may be appropriate for a patient who has previously had a stroke and wishes to reduce the
			risk of a second, potentially more disabling event from occurring.18 Clearly, discussions about medicines need
			to be focused on the individual preferences of the patient and their specific circumstances and life stage.
		 
		
		Assessing prescription appropriateness
		Factors which should be considered when prescribing medicines to older people include:19
		
			- Remaining life expectancy (Table 1)
 
			- Time until benefit of treatment
 
			- Treatment target
 
			- Goals of care
 
		
		 
		
		
			
				
					| Male  | 
					Female | 
				
				
					| Age years  | 
					Expected number of years of life remaining | 
					Age years  | 
					Expected number of years of life remaining 
					 | 
				
				
					| 65 | 
					18.8 | 
					65 | 
					21.2 | 
				
				
					| 70 | 
					15.0 | 
					70 | 
					17.1 | 
				
				
					| 75 | 
					11.5 | 
					75 | 
					13.3 | 
				
				
					| 80 | 
					8.6 | 
					80 | 
					9.8 | 
				
				
					| 85 | 
					6.2 | 
					85 | 
					6.9 | 
				
				
					| 90 | 
					4.5 | 
					90 | 
					4.8 | 
				
			
			Table 1: Life expectancy by age for older New Zealand male and female populations, 2009 - 201120
		 
		
		
		Consider using prescribing tools 
		Prescribing tools provide specific examples of medicines that may be inappropriate for older people and are an effective
			way of reducing adverse drugs reactions.
		The STOPP/START criteria were developed to improve prescribing to patients aged over 65 years. The criteria consist
			of two components; the first to halt inappropriate or unnecessary medicines in older patients, the second is used to consider
			medicine appropriateness when initiating treatment. An advantage of the STOPP/START criteria is that it accounts for patient
			co-morbidities. The STOPP/START criteria was considered by an expert panel to be the most appropriate tool for measuring
			treatment adherence and appropriateness in patients with multiple co-morbidities.12
		 
 The STOPP/START toolkit can be accessed from: 
		www.cumbria.nhs.uk (key
			words = STOPP/START). 
		The Beers criteria consists of three lists of medicines ranked according to their potential for causing adverse reactions
			in older people. It was recently updated by the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) in 2012.21 However, the criteria's
			usefulness is limited as it does not take into account individual patient needs and co-morbidities.
		The first grouping is medicines that are known to cause adverse reactions in older people. The second classification
			is medicines that may be inappropriate for older people with specific diseases or risks factors. The third list is medicines
			that should be prescribed to older people with caution.
		 
 For further information see the American Geriatrics Society. Available
			from: www.americangeriatrics.org (keyword search = Beers). 
		The New Zealand Formulary (NZF) presents two options for obtaining information about medicine interactions:
		
			- Stockley's Interaction Alerts
 
			- British National Formulary (BNF) interaction summaries
 
		
		 
 For further information see: "Medicine
				interactions: using the New Zealand Formulary", BPJ 46 (Sep, 2012). 
		 
		
		
			The danger of under-prescribing
			Under-prescribing is the omission of medicines which are generally recommended by clinical guidelines for the treatment
				or prevention of a disease or condition.15 A study of 123 patients aged over 60 years found that approximately
				one-third of instances of under-prescribing were not clearly justified.15
			Commonly under-prescribed treatments for older people include medicines for the secondary prevention of coronary and
				cerebrovascular diseases and osteoporotic fractures.8 In particular, there is good evidence of short-term
				benefits gained from continuing treatment of hypertension in people aged over 80 years.16
			Although inappropriate under-prescribing should be avoided, it is complicated by the fact that clinical guidelines
				are generally for single conditions and do not take into account co-morbidities. The use of several different guidelines
				for one patient with multiple conditions may lead to inappropriate prescribing, if all advice is followed concurrently.6
			If prescribers are unsure whether a medicine is appropriate for an older patient then discussion with a geriatrician,
				general physician or clinical pharmacist is recommended.
		 
		 
		 
		
		
		When medicines are prescribed
		
		Consider if there are any medicines that can be altered or stopped if a new medicine is started, e.g. if the patient
			is switched from an NSAID to an opioid, a gastro-protective medicine may no longer be necessary. 
		If repeating a prescription, confirm that the original is still applicable, e.g. if a loading dose of colecalciferol
			has been prescribed, check that subsequent prescriptions do not repeat the loading dose.
		Double check the prescription is correct both before printing it out and handing it to the patient.
		Ensure the patient knows what medicine they have been prescribed and how it should be taken. Where appropriate, encourage
			people to take educational material home about both the medicine prescribed and the condition being treated. This can
			increase patient understanding and family/ whānau involvement in treatment. 
		When finishing a consultation a good approach to see if the patient has understood a message is to ask them what they
			will say to their partner or family when they return home. 
		 
 The Ministry of Health website provides information and links to patient
			resources for diseases that are common in older people, e.g. cardiovascular disease, cancer and diabetes. See: 
			www.health.govt.nz 
		 
		
		Regular monitoring for adverse effects and treatment adherence
		It has been suggested that suboptimal monitoring of older people taking medicines may be a more significant problem
			than inappropriate prescribing.8 Effective monitoring requires regular recording of parameters such as body
			weight and blood pressure, scheduling of relevant laboratory tests, e.g. serum creatinine and HbA1c, regular
			communication between patient and clinician and a good knowledge of the patient's cognitive function and general wellbeing. 
		 
		
		When to decide to withdraw a medicine
		
		Medicine withdrawal should be considered for older people when:22 
		
			- There are a large number of medicines in use
 
			- Adverse drug reactions are suspected or falls have occurred
 
			- Treatment is ineffective
 
			- The goals of care change due to declining organ function
 
		
		A study investigating inappropriate medicine use in 70 community dwelling older people recommended discontinuation of
			311 medications in 64 people.23 Of the medicines that were discontinued, only 2% were restarted due to the
			recurrence of the original indication.23
		Medicine groupings that may be appropriate for withdrawal in older people include; anticholinergics, antihistamines,
			antiplatelet medicines, centrally acting medicines (e.g. antipsychotics, benzodiazepines), diuretics, NSAIDs, proton pump
			inhibitors and vasodilators. 
		 
 For further information see: "A
				practical guide to stopping medicines in older people", BPJ 27 (Apr, 2010). 
		If a medicine is withdrawn due to a suspected adverse drug reaction, symptom resolution can be expected once the medicine
			has been cleared from the patient's blood (within three to five half-lives) - if the reaction is dose dependent.22 Symptoms
			such as delirium and skin reactions and those caused by renal or hepatotoxicity may take considerably longer to resolve.
		 
		
		
			The "Pill Pruner" 
			A medication review guide for frail, older patients, the Pill Pruner, has been developed in New Zealand. The guide
				condenses the STOPP/START criteria into the 13 most potentially inappropriate medicines relevant to New Zealand prescribing
				practice. These are printed on a pocket-sized card. 
			The Pill Pruner was tested at Christchurch Hospital on two groups of 500 people aged over 75 years, consecutively admitted
				to hospital. On admission, over 70% of patients were taking five or more medicines. Before the Pill Pruner was introduced,
				the mean number of medicines on discharge increased from 6.8 to 7.7. When the Pill Pruner was introduced, no statistically
				significant increase in discharge medicines occurred (medicines increased from 6.3 to 6.5). Over the course of the study
				over 1000 medicines were stopped including: loop diuretics, antiplatelet medicine, statins, ACEIs, β-blockers and
				benzodiazepines. There appeared to be no harmful effects of medicine withdrawal. Medicine changes were communicated to
				the patient's General Practitioner and community pharmacist. Of the General Practitioners who responded to follow-up
				questionnaires, less than 10% reported a need to restart medicines in patients. 
			The Pill Pruner has yet to be trialled in primary care. As hospital admission is frequently a period of acute illness
				and increased need, use of the Pill Pruner in general practice may be even more effective. Publication of the results
				of the Pill Pruner study is underway.
			
For further information see: "Polypharmacy in the elderly - evaluating the
			Pill Pruner project." Available from: 
			http://www.otago.ac.nz/christchurch/research/populationhealth/studentships/
		 
		 
		
		
		
			How to "de-prescribe" and issues to be aware of
			Before "de-prescribing" an unnecessary medicine, a discussion should be held with the patient as to why the change
				has been suggested and what can be expected. This is important, as many medicines have a placebo component to their effectiveness.
				Explain that the process will be monitored.
			If there is more than one medicine to be de-prescribed, these should be prioritised and withdrawn one at a time. The
				dose should be slowly reduced over a period of weeks to months and the patient warned and monitored for signs of:22
			
				- Withdrawal - common in medicines acting on the central nervous system
 
				- Rebound symptoms - e.g. rebound tachycardia and hypertension following beta blocker withdrawal, or rebound gastric
					acid secretion following withdrawal of a proton pump inhibitor
 
			
			
				- Unmasked drug interactions - e.g. the INR of a normally stable patient taking warfarin may decrease over several
					weeks following cessation of amiodarone
 
			
			Clinicians should consider if any new symptoms are due to withdrawal or a re-emergence of the indicated condition.
				If the patient experiences significant withdrawal, the medicine can be reintroduced, possibly at a reduced dose. Assessments
				should also focus on the beneficial aspects of de-prescribing, which can reinforce patient adherence and the prescriber's
				confidence to reduce medicines.