Aspirin, along with lipid-lowering and blood pressure-lowering medicines, is indicated for the management of cardiovascular
disease risk. Updated guidance in the Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment and Management for Primary Care consensus
statement (2018), released by the Ministry of Health, uses the estimated five-year CVD risk, along with the patient’s
age, to recommend when aspirin should be considered for the primary or secondary prevention of CVD.
The identification of people with a low (< 5%), intermediate (5-15%) or high (≥ 15%) five-year CVD risk in the 2018
CVD consensus statement is based on the New Zealand Primary Prevention equations, which were developed from the New Zealand
PREDICT study. Risk calculators based on New Zealand PREDICT equations are now incorporated into decision support software or the 2018 CVD consensus
statement recommendations based on the categorisations of risk can be used. In addition, a Canadian interactive online CVD risk calculator also
the ability to estimate risks and benefits based on the PREDICT equations. It is available at:
The CVD consensus statement recommends considering aspirin for primary prevention in people who have a high risk of
CVD (≥ 15%) and are aged under 70 years. In addition, documented coronary disease, carotid disease (plaque on ultrasound)
or a high coronary calcium score on CT scan (> 400) is considered to equate to high risk (>15%) and the CVD consensus
statement recommends considering aspirin in people with these conditions.
For people aged 70 years and older, aspirin for primary prevention is not recommended due to the unclear balance between
the benefits and harms of treatment. This recommendation is supported by recent evidence from the ASPREE clinical trial
which showed that aspirin treatment increased the risk of bleeding, without reducing the number of cardiovascular events,
in people in this age group.1
Aspirin is recommended for all people with established CVD (see: “Definition of established CVD”)
for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events, regardless of age, as the benefits of treatment are considered
to outweigh the increased risk of bleeding.
If aspirin is indicated, the benefits and risks associated with this treatment should be discussed with the patient.
The decision whether to initiate treatment should include consideration of factors such as the risk of bleeding, co-morbidities,
history of CVD, and life-expectancy. For people with a high CVD risk, lipid-lowering or blood pressure-lowering medicines
are strongly recommended in the 2018 CVD consensus statement. Lifestyle advice, e.g. diet, weight management, physical
activity, smoking cessation, is recommended for all people, regardless of CVD risk.
Definition of established CVD
People with established CVD includes those who have a history of:
- Coronary artery bypass grafting
- Myocardial infarction
- Percutaneous coronary intervention
- Peripheral vascular disease
- Transient ischaemic attack
- Congestive heart failure
People with risk factors equivalent to established CVD, i.e. a five-year risk ≥ 15%, include those with:
- Asymptomatic carotid or coronary disease, i.e. coronary artery calcium score > 400 of plaque identified on carotid
ultrasound or CT angiography
- Familial hypercholesterolaemia
- Chronic kidney disease with an eGFR < 30 mL/min/m2
- Diabetes with an eGFR < 45 mL/min/m2
For further information on the updated CVD risk assessment and management statement, see:
For further information on aspirin in the management of CVD, see:
A full copy of the CVD consensus statement can be found here:
- McNeil JJ, Wolfe R, Woods RL, et al. Effect of aspirin on cardiovascular events and bleeding in the healthy elderly.
New England Journal of Medicine 2018;379:1509–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1805819
This audit identifies patients who are taking aspirin for the primary or secondary prevention of CVD to determine if
ongoing treatment is indicated based upon the following recommendations in the 2018 CVD consensus statement:
- Aspirin is recommended for all patients with established CVD for secondary prevention
- Aspirin may be considered for primary prevention in patients aged < 70 years with an estimated five-year CVD risk
of ≥ 15%*
- Aspirin is not recommended for primary prevention in patients aged ≥ 70 years, regardless of CVD risk
- Aspirin is not recommended for primary prevention in patients with an estimated five-year CVD risk < 15%
* Estimate based upon the PREDICT equations or presence of an equivalent high-risk co-morbidity
Recommended audit standards
Ideally, all patients who are taking aspirin long-term for the management of CVD risk should have a documented indication for primary or
secondary prevention in their clinical record, based upon the recommendations in the 2018 CVD consensus statement.
The initial target may be lower in the first cycle of the audit as the consensus recommendations are still relatively new and previous guidance recommended aspirin
for primary prevention in all patients with a high CVD risk, rather than stratifying the recommendation based upon the patient’s age. The estimated five-year CVD risk
calculated with the new equations may differ from previous CVD risk assessment and consequently alter the risk management strategy for some patients, i.e. whether
aspirin is recommended. An increase in the number of patients who meet the required indications for aspirin treatment should be expected after the second cycle
as more time will have elapsed for the recommendations in the consensus statement to be implemented.
Identifying eligible patients
All patients who are currently being treated with aspirin for the primary or secondary prevention of CVD can be audited to assess
whether they have an appropriate indication for ongoing use.
You will need to have a system in place that allows you to identify patients who are currently prescribed aspirin. Many practices will be able to do this by running a
“query” through their PMS. The notes of identified patients will need to be reviewed and those who are prescribed low-dose aspirin, i.e. 75 to 150 mg, selected for the audit.
A sample size of 30 patients is sufficient for this audit. However, it is recommended that all patients using aspirin for the prevention of CVD are subsequently reviewed.
Criteria for a positive result
A positive result is if a patient who has been taking aspirin for the primary or secondary prevention of CVD has documented
evidence in their patient record of:
- A CVD risk score ≥ 15%* AND they are aged < 70 years, i.e. for primary prevention
- A history of established CVD, i.e. for secondary prevention
* Or high-risk equivalent co-morbidity
For each patient who is currently taking aspirin, record on the data sheet whether there is an indication for primary
or secondary prevention of CVD. Calculate the percentage of your patients who have a current indication for aspirin treatment
by taking the number who meet the requirements for primary or secondary prevention and dividing it by the number of patients
If there is no documented evidence for primary prevention, i.e. aged ≥ 70 years or have a CVD risk < 15%,* or no
documented evidence for secondary prevention, i.e. no history of CVD, the patient should be flagged for review. If there
is no indication for continuing aspirin after the review, discuss with the patient the option of stopping treatment.
For further information on starting the conversation about stopping medicines, see:
* Or no high-risk equivalent co-morbidity
The first step to improving medical practice is to identify the criteria where gaps exist between
expected and actual performance and then to decide how to change practice.
Once a set of priorities for change have been decided on, an action plan should be developed to implement any changes.
It may be useful to consider the following points when developing a plan for action (RNZCGP 2002).
Problem solving process
- What is the problem or underlying problem(s)?
- Change it to an aim
- What are the solutions or options?
- What are the barriers?
- How can you overcome them?
Overcoming barriers to promote change
- Identifying barriers can provide a basis for change
- What is achievable – find out what the external pressures on the practice are and discuss ways of dealing with
them in the practice setting
- Identify the barriers
- Develop a priority list
- Choose one or two achievable goals
- No single strategy or intervention is more effective than another, and sometimes a variety of methods are needed
to bring about lasting change
- Interventions should be directed at existing barriers or problems, knowledge, skills and attitudes, as well as
performance and behaviour
Monitoring change and progress
It is important to review the action plan developed previously at regular intervals. It may be
helpful to review the following questions:
- Is the process working?
- Are the goals for improvement being achieved?
- Are the goals still appropriate?
- Do you need to develop new tools to achieve the goals you have set?
Following the completion of the first cycle, it is recommended that the doctor completes the first part of the
of Medical Practice summary sheet (Appendix 1).
Undertaking a second cycle
In addition to regular reviews of progress with the practice team, a second audit cycle should be completed in order
to quantify progress on closing the gaps in performance.
It is recommended that the second cycle be completed within 12 months of completing the first cycle. The second cycle
should begin at the data collection stage. Following the completion of the second cycle it is recommended that practices
complete the remainder of the Audit
of Medical Practice summary sheet.
This audit was prepared in conjunction with the Heart Foundation of New Zealand.
Claiming credits for Te Whanake CPD programme requirements
Practice or clinical audits are useful tools for improving clinical practice and credits can be claimed towards the Patient Outcomes (Improving Patient Care and Health Outcomes) learning category of the Te Whanake CPD programme, on a credit per learning hour basis. A minimum of 12 credits is required in the Patient Outcomes category over a triennium (three years).
Any data driven activity that assesses the outcomes and quality of general practice work can be used to gain credits in the Patient Outcomes learning category. Under the refreshed Te Whanake CPD programme, audits are not compulsory and the RNZCGP also no longer requires that clinical audits are approved prior to use. The college recommends the PDSA format for developing and checking the relevance of a clinical audit.
To claim points go to the RNZCGP website: www.rnzcgp.org.nz
If a clinical audit is completed as part of Te Whanake requirements, the RNZCGP continues to encourage that evidence of participation in the audit be attached to your recorded activity. Evidence can include:
- A summary of the data collected
- An Audit of Medical Practice (CQI) Activity summary sheet (Appendix 1 in this audit or available on the
N.B. Audits can also be completed by other health professionals working in primary care (particularly prescribers), if relevant. Check with your accrediting authority as to documentation requirements.