Published: 2 October 2019
Log in if you are a prescriber, to see your personalised and
practice prescribing data related to this article.
Key practice points:
- Approximately 9% of the population in New Zealand aged 18 years and older was dispensed a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) in 2018
- People of European ethnicity were 1.5 times more likely to be dispensed a SSRI than Māori and approximately four times more likely than Asian or Pacific peoples
- Dispensing rates of SSRIs are highest in people aged ≥ 80 years (11% of this age group)
- It can be difficult to differentiate short-term psychological
distress from depression; avoid making a diagnosis of
depression at the first consultation unless the patient has
severe symptoms with marked functional impairment or
has a history of depression. If there is immediate concern for
the patient’s safety, refer them to emergency mental health services.
- Clinicians often see patients when their symptoms are at their worst and discussing their mental health with an empathetic practitioner can provide substantial relief
- Non-pharmacological strategies, e.g. sleep hygiene, exercise, re-engaging with hobbies, connecting with family/friends,
should be recommended to all patients with distress or depression
- Combined pharmacological and psychological treatment is recommended for people with moderate to severe depression or symptoms that persist despite other interventions.
- Active follow-up is important for all patients presenting with distress or depression. Put a plan for review in place, e.g. a
phone call from the practice nurse after 24–48 hours and a follow-up appointment in one to two weeks to assess their symptoms.
Depression is typically diagnosed based on a combination of symptoms such as low mood, loss in pleasure or enjoyment in
activities, feelings of low self-esteem, self-worthlessness, guilt, and somatic symptoms, e.g. agitation, disrupted sleep,
loss of appetite, weight loss or gain, low energy, loss of libido. The number and severity of symptoms within a defined
period, e.g. previous two weeks, is used to diagnose depression and classify severity (see: “Tools for assessing
patients with depression”).
However, it can be difficult to determine whether symptoms are caused by depression or short-term distress (e.g. due to
stress, grief, health concerns), particularly at the first consultation.1, 2 Patients with short-term distress
can score highly on a depression inventory such as the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), which could lead to initiation
of pharmacological treatment.1 Many of these people will experience a substantial improvement in their symptoms
in the following weeks, and will have a lower score on the PHQ-9 when re-screened.1 This improvement may mean
that the patient no longer meets the threshold for a depression diagnosis or that pharmacological treatment is no longer
recommended. Patients who are initiated on an antidepressant at the first consultation may attribute the improvement in
their symptoms to the medicine, when it is likely that they would have improved anyway.
Talk first, prescribe later (if necessary)
It is crucial that patients presenting with mental health concerns receive immediate management, but in many cases an
appropriate initial treatment is a discussion with an empathetic practitioner. This can provide substantial relief, regardless
of whether any other treatment is initiated.
The following strategies may be useful for managing patients presenting with mental health concerns:1
- Avoid making a diagnosis of depression at the first consultation unless the patient has severe symptoms with marked
functional impairment or has a history of depression. Many people will experience an improvement in their symptoms following
the initial consultation and with non-pharmacological interventions (see below).
- The PHQ-2* can be used as a quick screening tool to rule out depression in patients presenting with somatic
symptoms. If screening indicates that depression is possible, a more comprehensive depression inventory, e.g. PHQ-9, can
be used
- Patients should be asked about suicidal ideation and intent. If they are at immediate risk of harming themselves or
others, they should be urgently referred (i.e. the same day) to mental health services; for
further information on suicide prevention, see: www.bpac.org.nz/2017/suicide.aspx
- The key factors in overcoming psychological distress or depression are: developing coping strategies, building resilience
to prevent or reduce relapses and establishing reliable family/whānau or social support
- Discuss mood fluctuations or distress in response to a certain trigger, and how these changes differ from depression;
ensure that patients understand that pharmacological treatment does not provide a “quick fix” and may not be the right
approach for them
- If a trigger for the patient’s symptoms can be identified, e.g. work stress, relationship breakdown, financial concerns,
health worries or loneliness, helping patients to find coping strategies and a pathway toward resolution (if possible)
is crucial to their recovery
- Discuss non-pharmacological strategies with all patients, including:
- Behavioural activation, e.g. re-engaging with social activities, friends/family/ whānau, hobbies, volunteering
- Sleep hygiene; for more information, see: www.bpac.org.nz/2017/docs/insomnia-patient.pdf
- Exercise
- Limiting alcohol and avoiding illicit drugs
- Self-guided, individual or group psychological treatments, e.g. cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), mindfulness (see
“Patient Resources”)
- Engagement with Kaupapa Māori mental health services if this aligns with the patient’s beliefs
- Establish a clear plan for review, e.g. arrange a phone call within 24–48 hours and a follow-up appointment in one or
two weeks to assess the patient’s symptoms
- Patients can be rescreened using the PHQ-9 to assess the success of interventions
*The PHQ-2 comprises two questions, and an answer of yes to either warrants further investigation:
1. Have you felt depressed, down or hopeless for all or most of the past month? 2. Have you lost interest or
pleasure in all or most activities over the past month?
Non-pharmacological interventions are appropriate for older people too
There are many factors that increase the likelihood of psychological distress or depression in older people, including
loss of independence, limited mobility, chronic illness, bereavement, social isolation and loneliness. Older people living
in residential care may be at greater risk for depression than those who are community-dwelling.3 Antidepressants
are only likely to provide benefit to those with moderate to severe symptoms of depression, and will not treat sadness,
loneliness or grief. The risk-benefit analysis for initiating an antidepressant in an older person is also influenced by
the increased risk of adverse effects, e.g. hyponatraemia, anticholinergic effects, falls, gastro-intestinal bleeding and
medicine interactions.
Psychological treatment is just as effective in older people, however, they are less likely to be referred for this.3,4 Non-pharmacological
strategies tailored to the patient’s capabilities should be recommended first-line or in conjunction with antidepressants if indicated.
Further information:
Antidepressant treatment is associated with a substantial placebo component and the benefit of treatment is proportional
to the severity of the depression, i.e. no benefit over placebo for mild depression, but a substantial benefit in patients
with severe depression.6 People can experience potentially significant adverse effects when initiating or discontinuing
an antidepressant, including suicidal ideation, sexual dysfunction, nausea, anxiety, insomnia, sweating, agitation and electric
shock sensations.1 Therefore, in people with mild depression, the risk of adverse effects are likely to outweigh
any possible benefits of antidepressants. Furthermore, once people are initiated on an antidepressant it can be difficult
to discontinue treatment e.g. due to discontinuation adverse effects or because the patient believes that pharmacological
treatment is necessary, and this may lead to long-term use.1
Practice points for prescribing antidepressants:
- Guidelines typically recommend treatment with antidepressants for people with moderate to severe depression and
depression that is resistant to non-pharmacological treatments2, 6
- Antidepressants may also be considered for patients presenting with mild symptoms who have a previous history of severe
depression, depending on their preference for pharmacological treatment1, 2
- After starting an antidepressant, it will often take several weeks before any benefit occurs and patients may require
dose adjustments to find their ideal therapeutic level
- Some patients will not respond to the first medicine they are prescribed and will require a change in treatment
- Non-pharmacological treatments, i.e. psychological and behavioural interventions, should be continued along with any
pharmacological treatment
- Review patients two weeks after initiating an antidepressant (or sooner if clinically indicated) and then again at four
to six weeks.2
- Antidepressants should ideally be continued for at least one year* following recovery from a single episode
of depression, or for at least three years following recurrent episodes.7
*In some cases it may be appropriate to discontinue after six months
SSRIs are the first-line antidepressant
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are generally recommended first-line for the treatment of depression due
to their more favourable adverse effect profile compared to other antidepressants.7 There are five fully subsidised
SSRIs available in New Zealand: citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine and sertraline. All SSRIs have similar
pharmacological properties and are similarly effective for the treatment of depression. However, adverse effects, medicine
interactions and patient tolerance may vary. These factors, along with any history of previous response, co-morbidities,
concurrent medicines and patient preference will influence selection.
Selecting a SSRI:
- If the patient has previously benefited from a particular SSRI, try that medicine again
- If initiating a SSRI for the first time, sertraline, citalopram and escitalopram are reasonable first choices:
- Sertraline or escitalopram are preferred if the patient is pregnant, or could become pregnant, or is breastfeeding8
- Citalopram and escitalopram are contraindicated in people with QT prolongation9
- Fluoxetine and paroxetine have a higher potential for medicine interactions compared with sertraline, citalopram and
escitalopram
- Paroxetine is associated with a higher risk of discontinuation syndrome than other SSRIs
- Refer to the NZF for information on medicine interactions, cautions and contraindications, and dosing regimens:
www.nzf.org.nz/nzf_2287
N.B. The funded brands of sertraline, paroxetine and fluoxetine will be changing from 1 April, 2020 (see: “Changes
are coming for the funded brands of sertraline, paroxetine and fluoxetine”).
For further information on the use of SSRIs and other antidepressants in the treatment of depression, see:
www.bpac.org.nz/2017/depression.aspx
N.B. A future article will cover the use of antidepressants in antenatal and postnatal depression
Changes are coming for the funded brands of sertraline, paroxetine and fluoxetine
From 1 April 2020, the sole subsidised brands of sertraline, paroxetine and fluoxetine will change (Table 1).
Table 1. Brand changes for sertraline, paroxetine and fluoxetine
Medicine |
Sole supply brand (Supplier) |
Date of listing |
Sole subsidised supply date |
Brand (Supplier) to be delisted |
Sertraline |
Setrona (Douglas) |
1 October, 2019 |
1 April, 2020 |
Arrow-Sertraline (Teva) |
Paroxetine |
Loxamine (Mylan) |
1 October, 2019 |
1 April, 2020 |
Apo-Paroxetine (Apotex) |
Fluoxetine |
Fluox (Mylan) |
1 November, 2019 |
1 April, 2020 |
Arrow-Fluoxetine (Teva) |
Patient information leaflets explaining these changes for each medicine are available from:
www.pharmac.govt.nz/medicines/my-medicine-has-changed/
Effective communication about brand change, provision of adequate information and reassurance is essential to ensure that
patients remain satisfied with and adherent to their treatment. Changing a funded brand of medicine may give rise to the
nocebo effect, i.e. adverse symptoms induced independently of the active component of the treatment.
For further information on the nocebo effect and strategies to minimise this, see:
www.bpac.org.nz/2019/nocebo.aspx
Are you a prescriber?
Login
to see how your personalised and practice prescribing data compares to that of your peers.
SSRI use nationally has increased over the past five years
In 2018, approximately 9% of people in New Zealand aged 18 years and older (approximately 300,000 people) were
dispensed a SSRI (Figure 1). The number of people receiving these medicines increased by 9% (after adjusting for population growth) between 2014 and 2017, and then levelled
off between 2017 and 2018 (Figure 1).* The reason for this increase is not known, but may involve factors such as more
people having and seeking help for mental health problems, as well as better awareness and recognition by clinicians. It is
possible that the threshold for prescribing may have lowered as SSRIs are considered safer and better tolerated than older
tricyclic antidepressants, thereby increasing use of this type of antidepressant.
N.B. Indications for treatment are not included in the Pharmaceutical Collection data, therefore, it is not possible to
determine the proportion of SSRI prescribing for depression compared to the other indications for these medicines
(see NZF for other indications).
* Venlafaxine dispensing also levelled off during this time period, therefore
increased venlafaxine use is not a likely explanation for the reduction in SSRI prescribing.10
Figure 1. The number of patients aged ≥ 18 years (per 1,000 registered patients) who were dispensed a SSRI from
community pharmacies in New Zealand annually from 2014 to 2018. Note the starting value on the Y axis.
Table 1 shows the number of patients per 1000 population that were dispensed a SSRI by you in the 12
months from January, 2018 to December, 2018, together with a comparator prescriber/practice* and national data
Comparators are matched to you by having a similar patient population in terms of sex, age, ethnicity and deprivation.
For further information, see: www.bpac.org.nz/report/ComparatorPractices.pdf
Table 1 The number of patients (per 1,000 registered patients) aged ≥ 18 years who were dispensed a SSRI from community pharmacies in
New Zealand in the 12 months from January, 2018 to December, 2018.
|
Your prescribing (per 1000 population) |
Comparator |
National |
Number of patients dispensed a SSRI |
|
|
|
SSRI use varies by ethnicity
In 2018, approximately 35% fewer Māori were dispensed SSRIs than people of European ethnicity. Asian and Pacific peoples
had the lowest SSRI dispensing rates (Figure 2). Interpretation of these data are challenging as the ideal level of prescribing
is not known, i.e. this may represent undertreatment of some groups and overtreatment of others.4
A New Zealand-based study including over 15,000 people found that Māori, Asian and Pacific peoples were less likely to
have been diagnosed with depression or anxiety, despite reporting higher levels of distress than Europeans, suggesting that
these mental health conditions may be underdiagnosed and consequently undertreated in these groups.11 *
However, there is also evidence of overtreatment. A report on the trends in mental health service use and unmet need included
as part of the New Zealand Mental Health and Addiction Inquiry (2018) found that approximately 10% of Pacific peoples, 20%
of Māori and 40% of people of other ethnicities who reported mild symptoms† were dispensed an antidepressant,
even though these medicines are only recommended for those with moderate to severe symptoms or persistent symptoms.4
There is likely to be a number of factors influencing the differences in SSRI dispensing between ethnic groups in New
Zealand including cultural differences in the presentation of mental illness and acceptance of mental illness diagnosis
and treatment, accessibility and cost of non-funded treatments.4
*Psychological distress was assessed using the Kessler-6 scale; participants rated six items on a five-point scale
to assess their risk of developing anxiety or depression.11
† As determined by their score on the Kessler-10 (K10) psychological distress questionnaire.
Figure 2: The number of patients aged ≥ 18 years (per 1,000 registered patients) who were dispensed a SSRI from
community pharmacies in New Zealand in the 12 months from January, 2018 to December, 2018, by ethnicity.
Trends in SSRI use by age in New Zealand in 2018
Approximately 1.5% of people aged < 18 years in New Zealand (12,500 people) were dispensed a SSRI in 2018 (Figure
3).
SSRI prescribing in young people has been trending upwards in New Zealand for several years, despite limited evidence supporting
the use of antidepressants in this age group.12 Fluoxetine is the only SSRI recommended for the treatment of
depression in people aged <18 years, however, this is an unapproved indication.13 Clinicians in primary
care should consider consulting with a child and adolescent psychiatrist or a paediatrician before prescribing.
SSRI use increases with age (Figure 3), with the highest rates in those aged ≥ 80 years (11% of this age group were dispensed
a SSRI). Within this age group, people of European ethnicity have the highest dispensing rate SSRIs; 11% of this group were
dispensed an antidepressant in 2018 compared to 7% of Māori, 5% of Asian and 3% of Pacific peoples.10 The risk
of adverse effects of SSRIs is greater in older people, e.g. hyponatraemia, anticholinergic effects, falls, gastro-intestinal
bleeding and medicine interactions. Therefore, in many cases non-pharmacological treatments may be preferred.
Figure 3: The number of patients (per 1,000 registered patients) dispensed a prescription for a SSRI from community
pharmacies in New Zealand from January, 2018 to December, 2018, by age
To download a printable version of your prescribing
reports, go to the reports section of your my bpac
Table 1 shows the number of patients per 1000 population that were dispensed a SSRI by your practice in the 12
months from January, 2018 to December, 2018, together with a comparator prescriber/practice* and national data
Comparators are matched to you by having a similar patient population in terms of sex, age, ethnicity and deprivation.
For further information, see: www.bpac.org.nz/report/ComparatorPractices.pdf
Table 1 The number of patients (per 1,000 registered patients) aged ≥ 18 years who were dispensed a SSRI from community pharmacies in
New Zealand in the 12 months from January, 2018 to December, 2018.
|
Your practice (per 1000 population) |
Comparator |
National |
Number of patients dispensed a SSRI |
|
|
|
SSRI use varies by ethnicity
In 2018, approximately 35% fewer Māori were dispensed SSRIs than people of European ethnicity. Asian and Pacific peoples
had the lowest SSRI dispensing rates (Figure 2). Interpretation of these data are challenging as the ideal level of prescribing
is not known, i.e. this may represent undertreatment of some groups and overtreatment of others.4
A New Zealand-based study including over 15,000 people found that Māori, Asian and Pacific peoples were less likely to
have been diagnosed with depression or anxiety, despite reporting higher levels of distress than Europeans, suggesting that
these mental health conditions may be underdiagnosed and consequently undertreated in these groups.11 *
However, there is also evidence of overtreatment. A report on the trends in mental health service use and unmet need included
as part of the New Zealand Mental Health and Addiction Inquiry (2018) found that approximately 10% of Pacific peoples, 20%
of Māori and 40% of people of other ethnicities who reported mild symptoms† were dispensed an antidepressant,
even though these medicines are only recommended for those with moderate to severe symptoms or persistent symptoms.4
There is likely to be a number of factors influencing the differences in SSRI dispensing between ethnic groups in New
Zealand including cultural differences in the presentation of mental illness and acceptance of mental illness diagnosis
and treatment, accessibility and cost of non-funded treatments.4
*Psychological distress was assessed using the Kessler-6 scale; participants rated six items on a five-point scale
to assess their risk of developing anxiety or depression.11
† As determined by their score on the Kessler-10 (K10) psychological distress questionnaire.
Figure 2: The number of patients aged ≥ 18 years (per 1,000 registered patients) who were dispensed a SSRI from
community pharmacies in New Zealand in the 12 months from January, 2018 to December, 2018, by ethnicity.
Trends in SSRI use by age in New Zealand in 2018
Approximately 1.5% of people aged < 18 years in New Zealand (12,500 people) were dispensed a SSRI in 2018 (Figure
3).
SSRI prescribing in young people has been trending upwards in New Zealand for several years, despite limited evidence supporting
the use of antidepressants in this age group.12 Fluoxetine is the only SSRI recommended for the treatment of
depression in people aged <18 years, however, this is an unapproved indication.13 Clinicians in primary
care should consider consulting with a child and adolescent psychiatrist or a paediatrician before prescribing.
SSRI use increases with age (Figure 3), with the highest rates in those aged ≥ 80 years (11% of this age group were dispensed
a SSRI). Within this age group, people of European ethnicity have the highest dispensing rate SSRIs; 11% of this group were
dispensed an antidepressant in 2018 compared to 7% of Māori, 5% of Asian and 3% of Pacific peoples.10 The risk
of adverse effects of SSRIs is greater in older people, e.g. hyponatraemia, anticholinergic effects, falls, gastro-intestinal
bleeding and medicine interactions. Therefore, in many cases non-pharmacological treatments may be preferred.
Figure 3: The number of patients (per 1,000 registered patients) dispensed a prescription for a SSRI from community
pharmacies in New Zealand from January, 2018 to December, 2018, by age
To download a printable version of your prescribing
reports, go to the reports section of your my bpac
Points for reflection
- Consider your antidepressant prescribing data, how
does it compare to that of your peers in terms of number of patients and their age and ethnicity?
- Do you initiate patients on antidepressants at the
first consultation? What factors do you take into consideration when making the decision to delay or prescribe immediately?
- Do you review patients who have been on antidepressants
long-term to see if treatment is still indicated?
- Antidepressant use nationally is highest among people aged over 80 years and older people are less likely to be referred
for psychological treatment. Is your threshold for prescribing an antidepressant to an older person lower than for someone
younger? Do you consider non-pharmacological interventions as effective and accessible for older people?
- A clinical audit of SSRI prescribing is available here: www.bpac.org.nz/Audits/ssri.aspx
Further information on diagnosing and treating distress and depression in primary care is available from the Goodfellow Unit:
Resources for patients: