Launch of an electronic adverse reaction reporting tool
Adverse reaction reporting is regarded as one of the most important sources of data for assessing the safety of a medicine.
Adverse reaction reports enable the detection of medicine safety signals and medicine quality defects.
On April 1 2009, the Minister of Health launched a new electronic adverse reaction reporting tool in New Zealand.
The tool is designed to facilitate the reporting of adverse reactions to the Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring
(CARM), and it uses an online reporting form pre-populated with patient details from the GP practice software.
The reporting form can be easily accessed by clicking on an icon within the Patient Management Software (a link to the
instructions for creating an icon for the reporting form on the MedTech32 pallet can be found in the bestpractice Decision
Support news items on the menu page). Once opened the tool automatically pre-populates the patient’s medical history,
medicine history and gives the reporter the option of including laboratory test results.
As vaccines make up approximately 50% of the adverse reaction reports received every year, the tool has been designed
with a specific vaccine tab. If the suspected medicine is a vaccine, the tool pre-populates the batch number, the date
of administration and how the vaccine was given.
Once a description of the reaction and other pertinent information is entered, one click of the mouse sends a confidential
encrypted report electronically to CARM.
ADR reporting in New Zealand
CARM receives on average 4000 spontaneous adverse reaction reports a year. General Practice accounts for approximately
60% of these adverse reaction reports.
When CARM receives a report, it is processed, coded then assessed by expert clinicians. Every report receives a personal
reply from CARM. including advice on the likely cause of the reaction, information specific to that reaction and how frequently
the reaction is reported.
The World Health Organisation rates New Zealand as having the highest number of adverse reaction reports submitted per
capita compared to other countries in their programme. In addition, reports from New Zealand are also regarded as being
of the highest quality. This is because New Zealand has one of the best reporting systems in the world. It is also apparent
that New Zealand’s healthcare professionals, who are interested in the safety of medicines, are motivated to report
and understand that adverse reaction reporting is part of their professional responsibility.
Although our adverse reaction reporting is rated highly, research indicates that at best only one in ten adverse reactions
are being reported in New Zealand i.e. the rate of under-reporting is in excess of 90%. Moreover, recent research conducted
in New Zealand examined the data stored in the Patient Management Systems of 30 General Practices. Of the 725 entries
in the medical warnings files, that recorded an adverse reaction or allergy to at least one medicine, only 21 were reported
As many GPs will know there are a number of barriers to reporting adverse reactions. These barriers include the absence
of a prompt to initiate reporting, realising that an adverse reaction has occurred, considering that the reaction is already
well known and finally, the time required to manually fill in reaction forms.
What are the benefits of using this tool?
First and foremost, the adverse reaction tool has been developed to help decrease the time involved in reporting.
Pre-populating the reporting form with patient data means manual entry of information is minimal. Electronic reporting
means less paperwork for busy GPs and removes the need to post or fax reports to CARM.
The ability to extract data from Patient Management software makes it easier for reporters to include results from laboratory
tests and other investigations. It is hoped that this will improve the ability of CARM’s experts to review the data
and to determine whether the medicine is causing the reaction.
Improving the analysis of adverse reaction reports is expected to provide direct benefits for all healthcare professionals.
As well as improving the identification of medicine safety issues, it will enable more timely advice to be provided. In
the future CARM will provide feedback to reporters electronically. This information can then be entered directly into
the patient’s records.
CARM is also able to add patient specific alerts through the medical warning module of the NZHIS system. Alerts are
attached to the patient’s unique NHI number so, for example, when a patient is admitted to hospital the presence
of the alert reduces the risk of that patient receiving medication they have already reacted to.
Reporters can be assured that the confidentiality of patient and reporter details is maintained in the electronic reporting
tool. As with the paper-based form, the information provided in the report is only viewed and used by CARM.
This new reporting tool is one of the first in the world that allows direct electronic reporting of adverse reactions
from GP practices. Regular use of the system will strengthen the close relationship that exists between prescribers and
the medicines safety community, and cement New Zealand’s position as a world leader in monitoring and managing medicines